
Originally Posted by
Cathal
Wall of text (aka babbling) warning XD
What's "acceptable" is obviously subjective too though.
Most PC gamers are quick to call all console games unacceptable, because they run sub-60 frames.
Someone else may feel game X is unacceptable because it doesn't have an FOV slider.
Bethesda games are also bug-ridden, but regularly applauded for how great they are.
Point stands, stating it's "objectively" one thing, and then using opinions to validate it, makes it subjective.
Whether you like it or not is your prerogative though. We, myself and some arguing with you, have an issue with you stating an opinion as a fact, not the opinion itself.
You dislike the game you didn't play, because you watched a YouTuber that hit a rough patch. That's okay. You're entitled to that opinion. It doesn't make it objective though.
Similar vein, I can say I dislike FFXV because of reasons XYZ. It launched exclusive to PS and ran like trash before some patches too. Metacritic shows a different story though, and even the thread on here shows people enjoyed it. Subjectively, it's a crap FF game. Objectively, it is not.
Just for ****s and giggles though, I checked the metacritic reviews on the two base consoles. Xbox users rated it roughly 50/50 positive vs negative (1600 to 1900)
PlayStation is worst off (2700 to 6200).
PC as shown above is best (18500 to 6900)
So positive versus negative is 22 800 vs 15 000. Objectively the game's pros outweigh it's cons, regardless of my feelings toward it.
Do I agree with how it was launched, no. Does CDPR deserve the refunds, delisting, lawsuits coming their way? Yes. They knew what they were doing hiding reviews, footage, making leading statements prior to launch, crunching employees, promising no more delays, etc.
I can objectively seperate that catastrophe from what the game is though.